11.06.2026


Anne Limbourg, M.D., Assistant Professor
Board-Certified Specialist in Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery
Breasts change over the course of a woman’s life—this is biologically normal and a completely natural process for many women. In this article, Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Anne Limbourg explains what actually happens in the tissue, which factors accelerate sagging, and how these findings influence the surgical planning of a breast lift (mastopexy).
The term breast ptosis (from the Greek ptosis, meaning “drooping”) describes the sagging of breast tissue and the nipple below their natural anatomical position. It is not a disease, but rather a structural change resulting from the interaction of several biological and mechanical factors.
The breast maintains its shape through a complex network of fascia, connective tissue strands (known as Cooper’s ligaments), and the capsule of the mammary gland. These structures are not static—they respond to hormonal fluctuations, mechanical stress, and the general aging process.
Over time, the collagen-rich connective tissue loses its tensile strength. Cooper’s ligaments stretch or develop microscopic tears. The mammary gland tissue, which has changed in volume due to pregnancy, breastfeeding, or weight loss, then lies within a shell that is too large—the skin sags, and the nipple migrates downward.
Several factors accelerate or contribute to the development of breast ptosis:
A standardized classification of ptosis is essential for surgical planning. The most widely used international classification was developed by Canadian surgeon Pauline Regnault and published in 1976. It describes the degree of ptosis based on the position of the nipple (mamille) relative to the inframammary fold (IMF)—the natural crease beneath the breast.
The inframammary fold is not an arbitrary line. It marks the transition between the breast and the torso and is anatomically anchored by fascial structures. Its position remains relatively constant—even if the overlying tissue changes. It therefore serves as a reliable fixed point for assessing sagging.
A clinically relevant special case is pseudoptosis: The nipple is still at or above the IMF, but the breast volume has shifted downward—the upper half of the breast appears empty. This condition often occurs after breastfeeding or with weight loss. Surgically, it must be distinguished from true ptosis, as the therapeutic implications differ.

The Regnault classification describes the morphology. For surgical planning, however, it is equally important to understand what the tissue itself—that is, the skin, gland, and fat—has “experienced” in terms of quality.
The quality of the skin is at least as crucial to the postoperative outcome as the classification of the degree of ptosis. Skin with good natural elasticity can adapt well to the new shape after the procedure and maintains the result for a longer period. Skin with reduced elasticity—for example, due to stretch marks (striae), intense UV exposure, or smoking—is less resilient.
Clinically, this is assessed through the so-called skin quality test: How quickly does the skin spring back when it is gently lifted and released? This assessment is part of every detailed consultation in our practice.
During pregnancy, breast volume increases significantly due to the growth of glandular and fatty tissue. The skin stretches. After weaning, the glandular tissue regresses—often faster than the skin can adapt. The result: sagging skin with reduced volume, frequently combined with a nipple that sits too low.
This is particularly relevant after multiple pregnancies or during prolonged breastfeeding. In such cases, a combination of ptosis and volume loss often occurs—a condition where a breast lift alone may not be sufficient, and additional procedures should be considered.
When patients lose a significant amount of weight—whether through exercise and dietary changes or following bariatric surgery—the breast undergoes significant changes due to the loss of fatty tissue. The remaining gland is then housed in a disproportionately large skin envelope. The extent of this discrepancy between gland volume and skin envelope size determines which surgical technique is indicated.

A mastopexy is not a one-size-fits-all procedure. The choice of technique depends on a careful analysis of the patient’s initial anatomical condition—which includes not only the degree and type of ptosis, but also skin condition, volume, and the patient’s individual preferences.
The more pronounced the condition, the more skin must be excised and repositioned—and the more extensive the incision:
In cases of ptosis without volume loss, a lift alone is often sufficient. In cases of accompanying volume loss—often following pregnancy or weight loss—an augmentation mastopexy (combination of lift and implant) may be more appropriate. This combination requires particular surgical care, as both procedures can affect blood flow to the nipple.
Another option for volume loss is autologous fat augmentation combined with a lift—especially for patients who wish to avoid foreign materials.
Stretching often causes the areola to change in size and position as well. Reducing the size and repositioning the areola is therefore a standard part of mastopexy.
During our initial consultation, we deliberately take the time to conduct a thorough clinical examination: What is the degree of ptosis in the breast? What is the skin quality like? How much glandular and fatty tissue is present? Are there any asymmetries? Only on this basis can a concrete surgical plan and an honest assessment of the results, scars, and recovery time be developed.
When is a breast lift recommended?
A mastopexy is recommended when the nipple is located below the inframammary fold, the breast tissue has sagged, and this change is considered unsightly. Good physical health and a stable weight are prerequisites for the procedure.
Can I still breastfeed after a breast lift?
In many cases, the ability to breastfeed is preserved, as a mastopexy typically does not involve a complete severing of the milk ducts. However, whether and to what extent breastfeeding is possible after the procedure cannot be answered in general terms and depends on the technique used. We will discuss this in detail during the consultation.
How long will the scars be visible after a breast lift?
Scars are generally most visible during the first three to six months. As healing progresses—over 12 to 24 months—they fade significantly with proper aftercare. The final appearance of the scars depends on the incision placement, the suturing technique, and the individual’s skin response.
Does it make sense to combine a breast lift with an augmentation?
That depends on the individual’s specific situation. If ptosis and loss of volume occur together, an augmentation mastopexy may be appropriate. This combination is technically more challenging and requires special expertise—we always discuss this based on the clinical findings.
How much does a breast lift cost in Hanover?
The cost of a mastopexy depends on the technique, the extent of the procedure, and individual planning. You will receive a transparent cost breakdown after the initial consultation and clinical examination. Health insurance typically covers the costs only in cases of significant medical indications.
Breast ptosis is a complex condition—and it requires a comprehensive approach. Anyone considering a breast lift would be wise to learn not only about scars and recovery time, but also about what their own tissue truly needs: a personalized analysis, a clear diagnosis based on a proven classification system, and a technique tailored precisely to the specific findings.
At our practice, we take the time this consultation deserves—without pressure and without hasty recommendations.
Whether you’re looking for a change, a correction, or a fresh start—we’ll take the time to listen to you. During a one-on-one consultation, we’ll work together to determine what’s possible and what’s truly right for you. We’ll approach this with empathy, honesty, and as equals. Schedule your consultation today at our practice in Hanover.